U.S. Needs To Lead in R&D, Not Follow

“Manufacturing and high-tech companies would benefit almost immediately,” said Pamela Villarreal, NCPA Senior Policy Analyst and coauthor of the report.  “The R&D tax credit reduces the tax burden on business spending that can have the greatest impact on productivity.”

In 1981, the U.S. enacted the most generous R&D credit of any nation, but today 16 other nations have a more generous tax break for R&D.  For example, Spain (44 percent), Mexico (37 percent) and Canada (17 percent) have larger R&D tax credits than the U.S. (7 percent).

Consequently, U.S. firms are conducting R&D elsewhere:

  • From 1998 to 2003, U.S. firms invested twice as much in R&D abroad as domestically.
  • As a result, R&D as a share of GDP slipped in the U.S. from 1.84 percent in 2000 to 1.67 percent in 2003.

“Higher R&D investment yields greater productivity and higher tax revenues,” Villarreal said.  “Making the credits permanent would provide incentives to conduct research and manufacturing in the U.S. rather than splitting the effort among nations.”

“Expanding the R&D credits to improve production methods (process R&D) will also result in increased jobs and productivity,” said Michael Barba, NCPA Graduate Student Fellow and coauthor of the paper.



Share Your Perspective